Political Forums

ahmetsecer

DARWINISTS' SHAMEFUL SCENARIOS ABOUT SUPPOSED HUMAN EVOLUTION: MSNBC STILL IMAGINES IT CAN DECEIVE PEOPLE


The MSNBC carried a report titled "Before and After Humans." This report, claimed that in 5 million years’ time, human beings will supposedly and literally evolve into extraterrestrials. The article was also illustrated with fictitious pictures representing 1-million-year stages showing human beings supposedly changing in appearance and turning into very peculiar entities. This gross deception is a scenario that various groupings unable to accept the collapse of Darwinism have come up with in the belief that "we may still be able to deceive people" and one that truly disgraces Darwinists. This time, Darwinists have resorted to pictures of extraterrestrials in order to suggest that human beings allegedly evolved and even that this process of imaginary evolution is still continuing.


The fact is, as all Darwinists are perfectly well aware, that people ALL OVER THE WORLD NOW THAT THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS A HUGE AND UTTER LIE. People have now realized that;

- Man WAS CREATED OUT OF NOTHING thousands of years ago, in perfect form and with the same appearance he has today,
- All the fossils unearthed belonging to human history POINT TO THIS FLAWLESS CREATION,
- All the fossils that Darwinists seek to portray as evidence of so-called human evolution have either BEEN FRAUDULENTLY MANUFACTURED or else BELONG TO EXTINCT APES,
- ALL the more than 100 million fossils unearthed BELONG TO PERFECTLY FORMED ORGANISMS THAT NEVER EVOLVED IN ANY WAY,
- THAT THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE SINGLE INTERMEDIATE FOSSIL,
- That, by looking at LIVING FOSSILS, living things have REMAINED UNCHANGED for millions of years and were created out of nothing in a single moment with all their perfect appearances and structures.
- They have EXAMINED THESE FOSSILS IN PERSON and TOUCHED THEM WITH THEIR OWN HANDS at fossil exhibitions.

Darwinists ARE NO LONGER ABLE TO CONVINCE PEOPLE TO THE CONTRARY.

Darwin himself admitted that the lack of any intermediate form fossils would constitute the greatest objection to his theory:

… why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined? … But, as by this theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the Earth?... Why, then, is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against my theory. (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, New York: The Modern Library, pp. 124-25, 179,)

That is what Darwin said and that is what happened. Not a single intermediate fossil has been found for 150 years. All the fossils discovered belong to independent life forms. Darwin’s theory had totally collapsed in the face of this manifest reality.

People no longer believe in Darwinist scenarios of "the first cell emerging spontaneously in muddy water."

- THEY ARE VERY WELL AWARE that the chances of a single protein of all those that make up the cell forming coincidentally are 1 in 10950, in other words, that it is IMPOSSIBLE,
- And that therefore, not a single component of as glorious and irreducibly complex a structure as the cell COULD NEVER COME INTO BEING BY CHANCE.

People now know that all Darwinist accounts of the origin and development of life are deceptions. IT IS NOW IMPOSSIBLE FOR DARWINISTS TO MISLEAD ANYONE.

Not a single intermediate fossil has been found for the last 150 years, and all the fossils discovered belong to independent life forms.

Therefore, Darwinists' desperate and hollow attempts to deceive people using hoax illustrations that merely reflect the wealth of their imaginations JUST HUMILIATE them. These efforts merely DECLARE THE COLLAPSE OF DARWINISM. They serve no other purpose at all.

In addition, one needs to remember that just 2 months ago another propaganda report, maintained that "human evolution is over." These conflicting claims give the impression that such reports are solely intended to propagandize Darwinism, that they are devoid of any evidence or logic, and are based solely on the idea that "the better propaganda I produce, the more supporters I will attract." This is a classic Darwinist demagogic technique that has been applied all over the world for the last 150 years. There is no scientific evidence or logical account to support evolution. The only aim is to familiarize people with a lie and convince them of this deception.

But since this has now been unmasked as a deception; Darwinism has rotted away; this false ideology has been left with no ground to stand on with the exposure of Darwinist frauds and demagoguery; people have now seen the proofs of Creation; have seen 100 million fossils that have remained completely unchanged; have witnessed proof that Darwinist myths are total nonsense; by Allah’s leave, people can no longer be taken in by the lie that is Darwinism. As documented by Science magazine, 90% of people in Turkey no longer believe in evolution (Science, 11 August 2006: pp. 765-766). The Atlas of Creation has been instrumental in putting an end to the Darwinist dictatorship. There is now no longer any way of keeping the evolution deceit alive.

Sabz5150

I am willing to engage in your debate. I want you to show examples of your claims.

Man was created from nothing? Law breaking claims! Evidence of such?

Unearthed fossils show this? Examples, please.

Evolutionary frauds? You mean the ones science weeded out? Got any good examples of this outside of the usual debunked ones?

All fossils point to creation? So where's the 300 million year squirrel fossil? Better yet, show me a London Underground mosquito fossil... I don't care the age, just show me one. If you cannot do that, then a Scarlet Robin fossil will do fine.

Not one single intermediate? Cool, then I expect you to show me why the intermediates found (there are a lot of them, actually) are not intermediates.

Living fossils? Really. Show me anywhere... any textbook, paper, research data, anything that says "living fossils" are a problem to evolutionary biology.

"1 in 10950, in other words, that it is IMPOSSIBLE", you say? Play the lottery by chance? You know that one in 7.5 million chance game that people always seem to win...

One in 10,950. Meaning that statistically I could roll a 10,950 sided die for 20,000 years, once per year, and roll the number of your choice.

I will also state, as a moderator, that you have been informed that you are instructed to participate in your threads. You have also been informed (and shown) the results of not doing so.

With that in mind, engage me in debate.

__________________
You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu.

So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists?

Sabz5150

I'll also add that the MSNBC article is cute, not entirely scientific... but that "cyborg" one seems kinda neat. Human beings augmented with machinery... I mean in a million years time we'll be doing things like replacing damaged and severed limbs with mechanical versions, installing machines to administer medicine or keeping the ol' ticker beating properly, maybe even a completely mechanical heart!

Oh, wait...

__________________
You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu.

So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists?