Political Forums

Sabz5150

Well in order to understand your lack of understanding, you first need to realize that what you ask for is completely laughable. Never does evolutionary biology say that man came from monkeys, nor does it say that mammals came from fish.

Basically what you are asking for is similar to asking for evidence that televisions give birth. See how funny that sounds? That's exactly what you sound like asking such a hilarious question and then trying to use that as evidence against evolutionary biology.

Now, ask for evidence of something evolution actually states and you might get a bit more than uncontrollable laughter directed at you.

__________________
You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu.

So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists?

Numpty

AHAHAHAHAHA!!

Use your own posts you plum. When you get your head out of that bible and stop believing in 1700 year old made up stories and join the rest of us in the the land of reality, you might just learn something.

Use some of these links to start the process.

BBC - Schools - KS2 Bitesize Revision - Science

BBC - Schools - KS2 Bitesize Revision - Science - Living things

Welcome to Planet Science

BBC - Science & Nature - Prehistoric Life

BBC - Science & Nature

Start at the begining, a very good place to start, when you learn to write, you begin with A, B, C. When you learn about science you begin with Air, Land and Sea.

(Just like Maria Von Trapp)

Enjoy the links and have fun.

__________________
Blessed are the Fundamentalists, for they shall inhibit the earth.

Sabz5150

The problem here is the lack of separation between what science (and evolutionary biology) says and what the media/creationists/uneducated says. Everybody of course looks at the famous picture of "evolution" and immediately thinks man-from-monkeys. The same goes for transitionals such as Tiktaalik... it conjures ideas that we all *poof*ed from fish.

Those ideas are not only wrong, they fly in the face of what evolutionary biology actually states. If man actually descended from modern monkeys, we'd have to take about a third of the biological journals, papers, texts and data we've collected and send it to the recyclers. Nowhere is such a thing stated. Never has such a thing been stated. Ideas like that are the product of way too much bad moonshine and anti-freeze. Subsequently, the idea that evolutionary biology is fully hinged on chance is also horribly incorrect. Again, never is it stated that evolution is a process of chance... but people see the word "random" and immediately think of throwing a handful of dice. They don't grasp the concept that while they think of this as a game of craps, evolution is more of a game of Yahtzee.

Put simply, evolution is the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators. That's it. It's an incredibly simple mechanism.

__________________
You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu.

So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists?