| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 102
![]() | The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Well, conservatives managed to screw over the Republican party yet again. This is the second time in recent memory that a moderate Northeastern Republican switched sides. Part of the reason the Democrats have a majority in Congress right now is that they ran conservative Democrats in Republican areas. Meanwhile, the Republicans are managing to chase away the few moderate Republicans they actually have left. LOL The Republican party has really become the ideological party in American politics. They're desperately trying to pretend it's still the 1980s, and meanwhile, the Democrats have become the party of everyone else; the moderates, the liberals, anyone 25 or younger, and anyone who's not white. Specter switches to Democrat, 'at odds' with GOP "WASHINGTON – Veteran Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania abruptly switched parties Tuesday, a move intended to boost his re-election chances that also pushed Democrats within one seat of a 60-vote filibuster-resistant majority. At a news conference, Specter said his switch to the Democratic Party was a "painful decision," but he found himself increasingly at odds with a Republican Party that has moved to the right. The Pennsylvania lawmaker said his philosophy was more in line with the Democratic Party. He said in the last few months he surveyed the sentiments of the GOP and found prospects for winning next year's primary looked bleak. Specter faced a tough challenge from former GOP foe Pat Toomey. Specter stunned Capitol Hill with word that he would switch parties. At the news conference, he told Democrats that he won't be an automatic 60th vote. He said he will follow his own approach to legislating. President Barack Obama called Specter almost immediately after he was informed of the switch to say the Democratic Party was "thrilled to have you," according to a White House official. Spurned Republicans said his defection was motivated by ambition, not principle. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said, "Let's be honest: Senator Specter didn't leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary due to his left-wing voting record. Republicans look forward to beating Senator Specter in 2010, assuming the Democrats don't do it first." Specter, 79 and in his fifth term, is one of a handful of Republican moderates remaining in Congress in a party now dominated by conservatives. Several officials said secret talks that preceded his decision reached into the White House, involving both Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden, a longtime colleague in the Senate. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell as well as Democratic leaders in Congress also were involved. With Specter, Democrats would have 59 Senate seats. Democrat Al Franken is ahead in a marathon recount in Minnesota, and if he ultimately wins his race against Republican Norm Coleman, he would become the party's 60th vote. That is the number needed to overcome a filibuster. Specter faced an extraordinarily difficult re-election challenge in his home state in 2010, having first to confront a challenge from his right in the Republican primary before pivoting to a general election campaign against a Democrat in a state that has trended increasingly Democratic in recent elections. Former Rep. Pat Toomey, whom Specter defeated in a close primary race in 2004, is expected to run again. Specter has acknowledged in recent months that in order to win a sixth term, he would need the support of thousands of Pennsylvania Republicans who sided with Obama in last fall's presidential election. "I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate," he said in the statement. Asked by a reporter what he had to say to his constituents, Specter replied with a smile, "I don't have to say anything to them. They said it to me." Specter has long been an independent Republican, and he proved it most recently when he became one of only three members of the GOP in Congress to vote for Obama's economic stimulus legislation. Then, he proved it once more, pivoting not long afterward to say he did not support legislation making it easier to form unions, a bill that is organized labor's top priority in the current Congress. In Pennsylvania, the chairman of the state Republican Party, Rob Gleason, said that Specter should offer a refund to Republicans who have helped fatten his war chest, which totaled $5.8 million at the end of 2008. "He should give them the option," Gleason said. Even before Gleason made his comments, Specter announced he would return donations he has received this election cycle "upon request." Specter has long been one of the most durable politicians of either party in Pennsylvania. In recent years, he has battled Hodgkin's disease, a cancer of the lymphatic system, but maintains a busy schedule that includes daily games of squash. As one of the most senior Republicans in the Senate, Specter held powerful positions on the Judiciary and Appropriations committees. It was not clear how Democrats would calculate his seniority in assigning committee perches. As recently as late winter, he was asked by a reporter why he had not taken Democrats up on past offers to switch parties. "Because I am a Republican," he said at the time. "I welcome Sen. Specter and his moderate voice to our diverse caucus," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in a statement." |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 122
![]() | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? While i agree with some of the comments he has said regarding the current nature of the republican party. I can only view this as a sad attempt to maintain his position of power. He's getting his ass handed to him in his current in current primary reelection. He's looking to make a big stink to gain support. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Blinding you with science Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,113
![]() | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Quote:
However, so are Specter's committee seats and of course the chair in the Senate. Too bad I didn't have an AM radio when this broke. I really wanted to hear Rush have a catastrophic heart attack on live airwaves.
__________________ You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu. So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists? | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Limbaugh had the appropriate response. Let them have him. Regardless of what his title has been, he's a liberal. He just didn't have the cahonas to fess up to it.
__________________ 'A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in.. And how many want out.' Tony Blair |
| | |
| | #5 |
| F.Y.P.M. Join Date: May 2007 Location: Groton Connecticut
Posts: 1,693
![]() | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? The GOP is done... A new age of republican will arise. My philosophical babble for the quarter... see you in a few months.
__________________ "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." -Mohandas Gandhi- "EVERYTHING is possible. The impossible just takes longer." *Unofficial Motto of the N.S.A. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Blinding you with science Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,113
![]() | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Call it the New Republic. Please call it the New Republic.
__________________ You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu. So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists? |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Of Logic and Liberty | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Do we care what Limbaugh says? He is the reason (if any) intellectuals are afraid of venturing into the republican camp. His polemical rants are ill-thought out and based on raw emotion rather than reason which is why he is basically yelling during his whole show.
__________________ "I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent." -Thomas jefferson |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Blinding you with science Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,113
![]() | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Quote:
And remember: These are the same people who will kill when the laws don't favor them.
__________________ You can’t crap all over Darwin and stem cell research and global warming, then come crawling back to science when you want Tamiflu. So if humans evolved to have bigger and better brains, why are there still creationists? | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member | Re: The Republicans just can't catch a break, can they? Example.
__________________ 'A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in.. And how many want out.' Tony Blair |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Let's say I break into your house | Curmudgeon | American Politics | 12 | 01-24-2008 07:15 PM |
| New Medical Break throughs | tvsej | Current Events | 9 | 10-15-2007 11:27 AM |
| A refreshing break | markx15 | Water Cooler | 29 | 07-11-2007 12:03 PM |
| Ex-soldiers break `silence' on Israeli excesses | z0z0 | World Politics | 13 | 01-28-2007 11:27 AM |
| Give Bush a Break! | Brent | American Politics | 41 | 10-13-2006 06:48 PM |